Posted by: Gary Ernest Davis on: February 11, 2010
On Physics
“How do I prove that 5 divides ??”
In this question, the variable “” should be thought of as restricted to integer values – in fact positive integer values – since divisibility for fractions or real numbers in general is trivial.
So another way to ask the question is: if  is a positive integer, how do we see that is always a multiple of 5?
First thought is to factor an  in  to get .
The reason this is suggestive is because 5 is a prime number , so if 5 divides  then either 5 divides  or 5 divides .
So now the question becomes, if 5 does not divide , why does 5 divide ?
We can think of this in terms of arithmetic modulo 5, where we only keep remainders after division by 5.
In the language of modular arithmetic, the question is:
if  is ?
means gives a remainder of 1, 2, 3 or 4 after division by 5 , so there are 4 cases to consider.
How about the other way around:
if is ?
means
What are the powers of integers modulo 5?
x | x^4 | x^4 (mod 5) |
0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 1 | 1 |
2 | 16 | 1 |
3 | 81 | 1 |
4 | 256 | 1 |
So this little table tells us that the only time
is when  is itself a multiple of 5.
This simple little argument shows the power of working with remainders after whole number division – which is just modular arithmetic.
Piere de Fermat stated, and Euler and others proved, a useful little gem of number theory, known as Fermat’s little theorem.
It states that if is a prime number then for all integers , .
Since 5 is a prime number, the result above is just a special case of Fermat’s little theorem.
This page has a number of different proofs of Fermat’s little theorem.
1 | fair_numbers
October 14, 2010 at 9:12 pm
Are we allowed to use mathematical induction?
Gary Davis
October 15, 2010 at 5:28 am
I don’t think anyone’s stopping you, are they?